Thank you Brendyn. I have started noticing more call for human-expert intervention in the design of AI lately but none about trusted-human intervention. Only regulatory oversight, after the event audit practices etc
So who do we trust to hold the public interest above all else, on a global scale?
The gap you've identified is real, every serious AI governance framework assumes trustworthy intermediaries exist, but nobody is actually building them. The Robodebt and Horizon comparisons land hard. Those weren't AI failures but accountability failures. What you are proposing is a crucial role that AI governance needs but has no name for yet.
Thank you Electra!
Love this article and you touched on some huge issues.
I personally believe governance and compliance are going to be vital.
The oblique private institutions angle is spot on.
Thank you Brendyn. I have started noticing more call for human-expert intervention in the design of AI lately but none about trusted-human intervention. Only regulatory oversight, after the event audit practices etc
So who do we trust to hold the public interest above all else, on a global scale?
The ‘trusted expert human intervention’ is key.
Do you see this being at the setup/sign-off and arbitration sections? As agent-to-agent, seems to be what most are moving towards.
Hi Electra, this is a genuinely important piece.
The gap you've identified is real, every serious AI governance framework assumes trustworthy intermediaries exist, but nobody is actually building them. The Robodebt and Horizon comparisons land hard. Those weren't AI failures but accountability failures. What you are proposing is a crucial role that AI governance needs but has no name for yet.